We have to be careful to draw too many conclusions as this is not a retail notebook. More of an unambiguous upside is the A4-5000's battery life. Just Don't expect to fire up Crysis 3 and experience free-flowing and fluid fragging. However, it does have just enough grunt for casual 3D gaming, especially with older titles. The more demanding passages in 3DMark are a genuine slide show, with frames taking multiple seconds to update. Yikes.įor the most part, our testing reflects that modest graphics firepower. Remember, AMD's hottest desktop graphics chip, as found in the AMD Radeon 7970 board, packs 2,048 shaders clocked roughly twice as fast, which works out to a raw performance advantage of 32 times. In the graphics department, well, there's really only so much you can do with 128 AMD GCN shaders. The Intel Atom D2700 dual core model typically scores around 0.75pts, so the AMD A4-5000 has it pretty much licked. It's not an even remotely fair comparison, we grant you, but it puts the A4-5000 in context. As for the match up with something like a quad-core Intel Core i7 chip, it's gruesome. That makes the A4-5000 less than half as grunt as a quad-core AMD FX CPU. A score of 1.45pts is not hugely impressive. Once applications and benchmarks have loaded, disk performance becomes much less of an issue, so what have we discovered?Ĭinebench 11 is a good starting point.
#Intel burn test gflop windows 8
That's a pity, because it makes it very hard to get a proper feel for what it has to offer as a full-on Windows 8 chip.īut it's not a complete write off. Much of the subjective experience with this new AMD A4-5000 APU was spoiled by the use of a super sluggish magnetic hard drive in the test whitebook laptop provided by AMD.
#Intel burn test gflop upgrade
Things aren't nearly as evenly matched on the graphics side where the PS4 has 1,152 graphics shaders, the Xbox One is thought to have 768 shaders and the A4-5000 has just 128 shaders.Īs for the match up with Brazos, well, you get double the number of CPU cores and around a 50 per cent up tick in graphics cores plus an upgrade from AMD's older VLIW graphics architecture to the latest GCN graphics spec. So in gaming terms, this chip might be almost level pegging with the latest consoles. Of course, they have twice as many cores, but there's a good chance some of those console cores may be reserved for non-gaming functionality. Intriguingly, both the Xbox One and the PS4 have Jaguar cores running at 1.6GHz, so pretty much the same speed as the AMD A4-5000. Then there's Brazos, AMD's Bobcat-based APU and the A4-5000's progenitor. Firstly, we have the next-gen consoles from Microsoft and Sony, both of which sport precisely the same CPU core and graphics arhcitecture. All told, it packs 128 of AMD's latest graphics shaders.Īt this stage, two pressing comparisons hove into view. It runs at 496MHz and sports AMD's latest GCN graphics architecture. Highlights include increased IPC or instructions per clock, increased frequency at any given voltage and more finely grained power management.Īs for the graphics part of the equation, AMD is calling the A4-5000's 3D core the AMD Radeon HD 8330.
The limit in terms of mobile devices is tablets and super slim laptops.Īnywho, AMD has targetted a range of improvements with the transition from Bobcat to Jaguar. It's in roughly the same ballpark as Intel's Atom CPU core, but isn't intended for smartphones. Jaguar is the follow up to AMD's Bobcat low-power CPU architecture. The fun starts with four AMD Jaguar cores running at 1.5GHz.
As for the battery pack, it's a 3,000mAh unit.Īnd so to the A4-5000 itself.
There's 4GB of RAM, 512MB of it reserved for the A4-5000's integrated graphics, more on which in a moment. Storage-wise, we're talking 320GB of old school magnetic hard drive sadly, so we'll do our best to exclude that from our performance assessments.
#Intel burn test gflop 1080p
It's a thin-an'-slim 13-inch laptop with a 1080p display.
Let's get the specs of AMD's reference whitebook sorted and then we can concentrate on that fascinating AMD A4-5000 APU, eh?
0 kommentar(er)
